Electroneum
Loading...
Searching...
No Matches
scalar_impl.h
Go to the documentation of this file.
1/***********************************************************************
2 * Copyright (c) 2014 Pieter Wuille *
3 * Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying *
4 * file COPYING or https://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.*
5 ***********************************************************************/
6
7#ifndef SECP256K1_SCALAR_IMPL_H
8#define SECP256K1_SCALAR_IMPL_H
9
10#ifdef VERIFY
11#include <string.h>
12#endif
13
14#include "scalar.h"
15#include "util.h"
16
17#if defined(EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER)
18#include "scalar_low_impl.h"
19#elif defined(SECP256K1_WIDEMUL_INT128)
20#include "scalar_4x64_impl.h"
21#elif defined(SECP256K1_WIDEMUL_INT64)
22#include "scalar_8x32_impl.h"
23#else
24#error "Please select wide multiplication implementation"
25#endif
26
27static const secp256k1_scalar secp256k1_scalar_one = SECP256K1_SCALAR_CONST(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1);
28static const secp256k1_scalar secp256k1_scalar_zero = SECP256K1_SCALAR_CONST(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
29
30static int secp256k1_scalar_set_b32_seckey(secp256k1_scalar *r, const unsigned char *bin) {
31 int overflow;
32 secp256k1_scalar_set_b32(r, bin, &overflow);
33 return (!overflow) & (!secp256k1_scalar_is_zero(r));
34}
35
36#if defined(EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER)
37/* Begin of section generated by sage/gen_exhaustive_groups.sage. */
38# if EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER == 7
39# define EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_LAMBDA 2
40# elif EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER == 13
41# define EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_LAMBDA 9
42# elif EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER == 199
43# define EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_LAMBDA 92
44# else
45# error No known lambda for the specified exhaustive test group order.
46# endif
47/* End of section generated by sage/gen_exhaustive_groups.sage. */
48
55static void secp256k1_scalar_split_lambda(secp256k1_scalar *r1, secp256k1_scalar *r2, const secp256k1_scalar *k) {
56 *r2 = (*k + 5) % EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER;
57 *r1 = (*k + (EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER - *r2) * EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_LAMBDA) % EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER;
58}
59#else
63static const secp256k1_scalar secp256k1_const_lambda = SECP256K1_SCALAR_CONST(
64 0x5363AD4CUL, 0xC05C30E0UL, 0xA5261C02UL, 0x8812645AUL,
65 0x122E22EAUL, 0x20816678UL, 0xDF02967CUL, 0x1B23BD72UL
66);
67
68#ifdef VERIFY
69static void secp256k1_scalar_split_lambda_verify(const secp256k1_scalar *r1, const secp256k1_scalar *r2, const secp256k1_scalar *k);
70#endif
71
72/*
73 * Both lambda and beta are primitive cube roots of unity. That is lamba^3 == 1 mod n and
74 * beta^3 == 1 mod p, where n is the curve order and p is the field order.
75 *
76 * Furthermore, because (X^3 - 1) = (X - 1)(X^2 + X + 1), the primitive cube roots of unity are
77 * roots of X^2 + X + 1. Therefore lambda^2 + lamba == -1 mod n and beta^2 + beta == -1 mod p.
78 * (The other primitive cube roots of unity are lambda^2 and beta^2 respectively.)
79 *
80 * Let l = -1/2 + i*sqrt(3)/2, the complex root of X^2 + X + 1. We can define a ring
81 * homomorphism phi : Z[l] -> Z_n where phi(a + b*l) == a + b*lambda mod n. The kernel of phi
82 * is a lattice over Z[l] (considering Z[l] as a Z-module). This lattice is generated by a
83 * reduced basis {a1 + b1*l, a2 + b2*l} where
84 *
85 * - a1 = {0x30,0x86,0xd2,0x21,0xa7,0xd4,0x6b,0xcd,0xe8,0x6c,0x90,0xe4,0x92,0x84,0xeb,0x15}
86 * - b1 = -{0xe4,0x43,0x7e,0xd6,0x01,0x0e,0x88,0x28,0x6f,0x54,0x7f,0xa9,0x0a,0xbf,0xe4,0xc3}
87 * - a2 = {0x01,0x14,0xca,0x50,0xf7,0xa8,0xe2,0xf3,0xf6,0x57,0xc1,0x10,0x8d,0x9d,0x44,0xcf,0xd8}
88 * - b2 = {0x30,0x86,0xd2,0x21,0xa7,0xd4,0x6b,0xcd,0xe8,0x6c,0x90,0xe4,0x92,0x84,0xeb,0x15}
89 *
90 * "Guide to Elliptic Curve Cryptography" (Hankerson, Menezes, Vanstone) gives an algorithm
91 * (algorithm 3.74) to find k1 and k2 given k, such that k1 + k2 * lambda == k mod n, and k1
92 * and k2 are small in absolute value.
93 *
94 * The algorithm computes c1 = round(b2 * k / n) and c2 = round((-b1) * k / n), and gives
95 * k1 = k - (c1*a1 + c2*a2) and k2 = -(c1*b1 + c2*b2). Instead, we use modular arithmetic, and
96 * compute r2 = k2 mod n, and r1 = k1 mod n = (k - r2 * lambda) mod n, avoiding the need for
97 * the constants a1 and a2.
98 *
99 * g1, g2 are precomputed constants used to replace division with a rounded multiplication
100 * when decomposing the scalar for an endomorphism-based point multiplication.
101 *
102 * The possibility of using precomputed estimates is mentioned in "Guide to Elliptic Curve
103 * Cryptography" (Hankerson, Menezes, Vanstone) in section 3.5.
104 *
105 * The derivation is described in the paper "Efficient Software Implementation of Public-Key
106 * Cryptography on Sensor Networks Using the MSP430X Microcontroller" (Gouvea, Oliveira, Lopez),
107 * Section 4.3 (here we use a somewhat higher-precision estimate):
108 * d = a1*b2 - b1*a2
109 * g1 = round(2^384 * b2/d)
110 * g2 = round(2^384 * (-b1)/d)
111 *
112 * (Note that d is also equal to the curve order, n, here because [a1,b1] and [a2,b2]
113 * can be found as outputs of the Extended Euclidean Algorithm on inputs n and lambda).
114 *
115 * The function below splits k into r1 and r2, such that
116 * - r1 + lambda * r2 == k (mod n)
117 * - either r1 < 2^128 or -r1 mod n < 2^128
118 * - either r2 < 2^128 or -r2 mod n < 2^128
119 *
120 * See proof below.
121 */
122static void secp256k1_scalar_split_lambda(secp256k1_scalar *r1, secp256k1_scalar *r2, const secp256k1_scalar *k) {
123 secp256k1_scalar c1, c2;
124 static const secp256k1_scalar minus_b1 = SECP256K1_SCALAR_CONST(
125 0x00000000UL, 0x00000000UL, 0x00000000UL, 0x00000000UL,
126 0xE4437ED6UL, 0x010E8828UL, 0x6F547FA9UL, 0x0ABFE4C3UL
127 );
128 static const secp256k1_scalar minus_b2 = SECP256K1_SCALAR_CONST(
129 0xFFFFFFFFUL, 0xFFFFFFFFUL, 0xFFFFFFFFUL, 0xFFFFFFFEUL,
130 0x8A280AC5UL, 0x0774346DUL, 0xD765CDA8UL, 0x3DB1562CUL
131 );
133 0x3086D221UL, 0xA7D46BCDUL, 0xE86C90E4UL, 0x9284EB15UL,
134 0x3DAA8A14UL, 0x71E8CA7FUL, 0xE893209AUL, 0x45DBB031UL
135 );
137 0xE4437ED6UL, 0x010E8828UL, 0x6F547FA9UL, 0x0ABFE4C4UL,
138 0x221208ACUL, 0x9DF506C6UL, 0x1571B4AEUL, 0x8AC47F71UL
139 );
140 VERIFY_CHECK(r1 != k);
141 VERIFY_CHECK(r2 != k);
142 /* these _var calls are constant time since the shift amount is constant */
143 secp256k1_scalar_mul_shift_var(&c1, k, &g1, 384);
144 secp256k1_scalar_mul_shift_var(&c2, k, &g2, 384);
145 secp256k1_scalar_mul(&c1, &c1, &minus_b1);
146 secp256k1_scalar_mul(&c2, &c2, &minus_b2);
147 secp256k1_scalar_add(r2, &c1, &c2);
148 secp256k1_scalar_mul(r1, r2, &secp256k1_const_lambda);
149 secp256k1_scalar_negate(r1, r1);
150 secp256k1_scalar_add(r1, r1, k);
151
152#ifdef VERIFY
153 secp256k1_scalar_split_lambda_verify(r1, r2, k);
154#endif
155}
156
157#ifdef VERIFY
158/*
159 * Proof for secp256k1_scalar_split_lambda's bounds.
160 *
161 * Let
162 * - epsilon1 = 2^256 * |g1/2^384 - b2/d|
163 * - epsilon2 = 2^256 * |g2/2^384 - (-b1)/d|
164 * - c1 = round(k*g1/2^384)
165 * - c2 = round(k*g2/2^384)
166 *
167 * Lemma 1: |c1 - k*b2/d| < 2^-1 + epsilon1
168 *
169 * |c1 - k*b2/d|
170 * =
171 * |c1 - k*g1/2^384 + k*g1/2^384 - k*b2/d|
172 * <= {triangle inequality}
173 * |c1 - k*g1/2^384| + |k*g1/2^384 - k*b2/d|
174 * =
175 * |c1 - k*g1/2^384| + k*|g1/2^384 - b2/d|
176 * < {rounding in c1 and 0 <= k < 2^256}
177 * 2^-1 + 2^256 * |g1/2^384 - b2/d|
178 * = {definition of epsilon1}
179 * 2^-1 + epsilon1
180 *
181 * Lemma 2: |c2 - k*(-b1)/d| < 2^-1 + epsilon2
182 *
183 * |c2 - k*(-b1)/d|
184 * =
185 * |c2 - k*g2/2^384 + k*g2/2^384 - k*(-b1)/d|
186 * <= {triangle inequality}
187 * |c2 - k*g2/2^384| + |k*g2/2^384 - k*(-b1)/d|
188 * =
189 * |c2 - k*g2/2^384| + k*|g2/2^384 - (-b1)/d|
190 * < {rounding in c2 and 0 <= k < 2^256}
191 * 2^-1 + 2^256 * |g2/2^384 - (-b1)/d|
192 * = {definition of epsilon2}
193 * 2^-1 + epsilon2
194 *
195 * Let
196 * - k1 = k - c1*a1 - c2*a2
197 * - k2 = - c1*b1 - c2*b2
198 *
199 * Lemma 3: |k1| < (a1 + a2 + 1)/2 < 2^128
200 *
201 * |k1|
202 * = {definition of k1}
203 * |k - c1*a1 - c2*a2|
204 * = {(a1*b2 - b1*a2)/n = 1}
205 * |k*(a1*b2 - b1*a2)/n - c1*a1 - c2*a2|
206 * =
207 * |a1*(k*b2/n - c1) + a2*(k*(-b1)/n - c2)|
208 * <= {triangle inequality}
209 * a1*|k*b2/n - c1| + a2*|k*(-b1)/n - c2|
210 * < {Lemma 1 and Lemma 2}
211 * a1*(2^-1 + epslion1) + a2*(2^-1 + epsilon2)
212 * < {rounding up to an integer}
213 * (a1 + a2 + 1)/2
214 * < {rounding up to a power of 2}
215 * 2^128
216 *
217 * Lemma 4: |k2| < (-b1 + b2)/2 + 1 < 2^128
218 *
219 * |k2|
220 * = {definition of k2}
221 * |- c1*a1 - c2*a2|
222 * = {(b1*b2 - b1*b2)/n = 0}
223 * |k*(b1*b2 - b1*b2)/n - c1*b1 - c2*b2|
224 * =
225 * |b1*(k*b2/n - c1) + b2*(k*(-b1)/n - c2)|
226 * <= {triangle inequality}
227 * (-b1)*|k*b2/n - c1| + b2*|k*(-b1)/n - c2|
228 * < {Lemma 1 and Lemma 2}
229 * (-b1)*(2^-1 + epslion1) + b2*(2^-1 + epsilon2)
230 * < {rounding up to an integer}
231 * (-b1 + b2)/2 + 1
232 * < {rounding up to a power of 2}
233 * 2^128
234 *
235 * Let
236 * - r2 = k2 mod n
237 * - r1 = k - r2*lambda mod n.
238 *
239 * Notice that r1 is defined such that r1 + r2 * lambda == k (mod n).
240 *
241 * Lemma 5: r1 == k1 mod n.
242 *
243 * r1
244 * == {definition of r1 and r2}
245 * k - k2*lambda
246 * == {definition of k2}
247 * k - (- c1*b1 - c2*b2)*lambda
248 * ==
249 * k + c1*b1*lambda + c2*b2*lambda
250 * == {a1 + b1*lambda == 0 mod n and a2 + b2*lambda == 0 mod n}
251 * k - c1*a1 - c2*a2
252 * == {definition of k1}
253 * k1
254 *
255 * From Lemma 3, Lemma 4, Lemma 5 and the definition of r2, we can conclude that
256 *
257 * - either r1 < 2^128 or -r1 mod n < 2^128
258 * - either r2 < 2^128 or -r2 mod n < 2^128.
259 *
260 * Q.E.D.
261 */
262static void secp256k1_scalar_split_lambda_verify(const secp256k1_scalar *r1, const secp256k1_scalar *r2, const secp256k1_scalar *k) {
264 unsigned char buf1[32];
265 unsigned char buf2[32];
266
267 /* (a1 + a2 + 1)/2 is 0xa2a8918ca85bafe22016d0b917e4dd77 */
268 static const unsigned char k1_bound[32] = {
269 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
270 0xa2, 0xa8, 0x91, 0x8c, 0xa8, 0x5b, 0xaf, 0xe2, 0x20, 0x16, 0xd0, 0xb9, 0x17, 0xe4, 0xdd, 0x77
271 };
272
273 /* (-b1 + b2)/2 + 1 is 0x8a65287bd47179fb2be08846cea267ed */
274 static const unsigned char k2_bound[32] = {
275 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
276 0x8a, 0x65, 0x28, 0x7b, 0xd4, 0x71, 0x79, 0xfb, 0x2b, 0xe0, 0x88, 0x46, 0xce, 0xa2, 0x67, 0xed
277 };
278
279 secp256k1_scalar_mul(&s, &secp256k1_const_lambda, r2);
280 secp256k1_scalar_add(&s, &s, r1);
281 VERIFY_CHECK(secp256k1_scalar_eq(&s, k));
282
283 secp256k1_scalar_negate(&s, r1);
284 secp256k1_scalar_get_b32(buf1, r1);
285 secp256k1_scalar_get_b32(buf2, &s);
286 VERIFY_CHECK(secp256k1_memcmp_var(buf1, k1_bound, 32) < 0 || secp256k1_memcmp_var(buf2, k1_bound, 32) < 0);
287
288 secp256k1_scalar_negate(&s, r2);
289 secp256k1_scalar_get_b32(buf1, r2);
290 secp256k1_scalar_get_b32(buf2, &s);
291 VERIFY_CHECK(secp256k1_memcmp_var(buf1, k2_bound, 32) < 0 || secp256k1_memcmp_var(buf2, k2_bound, 32) < 0);
292}
293#endif /* VERIFY */
294#endif /* !defined(EXHAUSTIVE_TEST_ORDER) */
295
296#endif /* SECP256K1_SCALAR_IMPL_H */
#define VERIFY_CHECK(cond)
Definition util.h:96
#define SECP256K1_SCALAR_CONST(d7, d6, d5, d4, d3, d2, d1, d0)
Definition scalar_4x64.h:17