User contributions
From Gentoo Wiki
Jump to:navigation
Jump to:search
- 09:39, 5 July 2025 diff hist +7 m Ext4 →Create a new journal-less ext4 volume : not _any_ fs-type, but in this case specifically ext4 current
- 10:00, 3 July 2025 diff hist +1 Ext4 →To create a journal-less ext4 volume : -> →Create a new journal-less ext4 volume
- 09:59, 3 July 2025 diff hist +16 Ext4 →To modify an existing ext4 volume : -> →Removing the journal from an existing ext4 volume
- 09:58, 3 July 2025 diff hist +13 m Ext4 →To modify an existing ext4 volume : format
- 09:56, 3 July 2025 diff hist +212 Ext4 Y2k38-wise: use journal-less ext4 instead of ext2, when a filesystem with journal is not desired.
- 09:52, 3 July 2025 diff hist +4 Ext4 rephrased once more...
- 16:44, 2 July 2025 diff hist +253 Ext4 rephrased the warning and note...
- 13:23, 29 June 2025 diff hist -1 m Ext4 →Creation : tf
- 13:22, 29 June 2025 diff hist +74 Ext4 Warning: not only mkfs.ext4, also mkfs.ext2, mkfs.ext3 and, when following the ext2v4 section: mkfs.ext2v4, as well es mke2fs (among others for other filesystems...)
- 13:16, 29 June 2025 diff hist +201 Ext4 clearer what "ext3/ext2 support" means...
- 13:02, 29 June 2025 diff hist -1 Zram →Using systemd zram-generator : Portage on zram: lz4 as default in the example, since it is faster (using less cpu resources) compared to zstd... current
- 12:58, 29 June 2025 diff hist 0 m Zram →Using systemd zram-generator : tf
- 12:53, 29 June 2025 diff hist +5,500 Ext4 journal-less ext4: "ext2v4" (moved from Zram#Using systemd zram-generator )
- 12:53, 29 June 2025 diff hist -1,953 Zram →Using systemd zram-generator : ext2v4 moved to ext4
- 11:24, 29 June 2025 diff hist +573 Ext4 Rework structure, notes and warnings about ext2/3/4...
- 10:04, 29 June 2025 diff hist +9 Kernel/Gentoo Kernel Configuration Guide →File system support : Wow... This is the first time that my own words were "accused" of being a product of LLMs... No, in fact, those were my own words. I am not a native-speaker, however, which may explain the way I sound... Anyway, long story short: Why not link to ext4? I do find it important to note that ext2 has advantages/disadvantages (ext3 should no longer be used, neither be available anyway). current
- 15:12, 27 June 2025 diff hist +1 m Kernel/Gentoo Kernel Configuration Guide →File system support : tf
- 15:10, 27 June 2025 diff hist +9 m Kernel/Gentoo Kernel Configuration Guide →File system support : some more rephrasing...
- 15:08, 27 June 2025 diff hist +17 Kernel/Gentoo Kernel Configuration Guide →File system support : phrasing changed so that the reader is not mistaken to believe that only ext3/4 provide a journal, since XFS and Btrfs do as well...
- 15:04, 27 June 2025 diff hist +805 Kernel/Gentoo Kernel Configuration Guide →File system support : ext2 and ext3 drivers should not be used...
- 16:45, 23 June 2025 diff hist +1,569 Zram →Using systemd zram-generator : ext4withoutjournal --> ext2v4 (which is much simpler); awk command added
- 15:13, 23 June 2025 diff hist +10 m Zram →Using systemd zram-generator : [fs_types]
- 15:10, 23 June 2025 diff hist +51 m Zram →Using systemd zram-generator : mke2fs.conf update
- 12:08, 5 May 2025 diff hist +606 Project Talk:PowerPC →ppc64 : new section current
- 15:01, 29 April 2025 diff hist +791 BIOS →Boot Sector : Note about error messages added. current
- 16:31, 16 April 2025 diff hist +51 Kernel/Gentoo Kernel Configuration Guide See also: +Dracut, +Installkernel
- 16:21, 16 April 2025 diff hist +67 Kernel/Gentoo Kernel Configuration Guide genkernel is unmaintained! (see genkernel article); dracut may be an alternative
- 13:36, 16 April 2025 diff hist +157 BIOS sources
- 13:20, 16 April 2025 diff hist +56 BIOS EEPROM and flash memory (sometimes also called "flash EEPROM") is erasable and reprogrammable. But also EPROM is reprogrammable. See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EEPROM and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BIOS#Hardware
- 10:19, 16 April 2025 diff hist -2 m BIOS BIOS chip, not EEPROM chip...
- 10:14, 16 April 2025 diff hist +40 BIOS repharsed
- 10:10, 16 April 2025 diff hist +436 BIOS BIOS upgrades can also address security issues, so this really is a two-way street. Malware of this type is called "BIOS rootkit".
- 18:50, 21 March 2025 diff hist +7 AMDGPU see e.g. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-9070-xt.c4229 (under "Navi 48 GPU Notes"): "Display Core Next: 3.2.0"; there is more than one ISA on Radeon cards, e.g. the Shader ISA is GFX x.y (NAVI48/44: GFX12.0), and there is VCN (Video Core Next) for hardware video coding, and so on...
- 18:39, 21 March 2025 diff hist +307 AMDGPU more Phoronix links...
- 18:23, 21 March 2025 diff hist +20 AMDGPU Yes. Kernel 6.14 and Mesa 25.1 are currently under development. I know.
- 18:16, 21 March 2025 diff hist +416 AMDGPU NAVI48: required versions
- 11:15, 4 March 2025 diff hist +2 m Ryzen →Troubleshooting : outline change: put all 1st gen Ryzen stuff under →1st gen Ryzen series (1000 series) : i.e. effectively moving →Broken VME (Virtual-8086 Mode Enhancements) on 1st gen Ryzen : up
- 11:09, 4 March 2025 diff hist -3 m Ryzen →Segmentation faults during compilation : the 1000 series is no longer sold, and this information is from 2017: using past tense.
- 11:04, 4 March 2025 diff hist +244 Talk:Ryzen →"See also the datasheet generated from above questionnaire." leads to dead link. : fixed by removing the note current
- 11:03, 4 March 2025 diff hist -277 Ryzen →Faulty hardware : remove the note with the missing Google document entirely and make the forum topics be a note instead. See: Talk:Ryzen#"See also the datasheet generated from above questionnaire." leads to dead link.
- 07:03, 11 February 2025 diff hist +464 EFI System Partition efibootmgr example
- 08:46, 10 February 2025 diff hist -6 m EFI System Partition fix (don't know what I did there...)
- 08:45, 10 February 2025 diff hist +34 EFI System Partition +rEFInd
- 12:42, 7 January 2025 diff hist +7 AMDGPU RX 7000 is a series, not a specific GPU
- 12:41, 7 January 2025 diff hist +37 AMDGPU RDNA4: https://www.techpowerup.com/330549/amd-debuts-radeon-rx-9070-xt-and-rx-9070-powered-by-rdna-4-and-fsr-4?cp=4
- 22:50, 3 January 2025 diff hist +31 AMDGPU ~ is not "unstable" but "testing" according to KEYWORDS
- 22:44, 3 January 2025 diff hist +1,084 AMDGPU RDNA 4: https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/?architecture=RDNA+4.0 and RDNA 3.5: https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/?architecture=RDNA+3.5 and furthermore the additions to RDNA 1-3 also from TechPowerUp as well as MESA (also pre-VEGA), see https://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/RadeonFeature/; PHOENIX also from TechPowerUP (RDNA 3); NAVI48: https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/?architecture=RDNA+4.0
- 15:26, 29 December 2024 diff hist +1 /etc/portage/make.conf →{{Anchor : työl
- 12:32, 29 December 2024 diff hist -1 /etc/portage/make.conf typo? according to Localization/Guide#L10N it should be L10N, not L10NS...
- 17:05, 17 December 2024 diff hist +1 YubiKey/PAM →Emerge : Why would anyone want to confute the module? I think it is more likely that those tools are for "(to) assist in the configuration" instead of "(to) assist in the confutation"... current