Subject: Re: Excessive dvmrp routes

From: "Ismail Ali" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:26:07 +0800

Sorry about the error. We are looking into it now. Thanks for the info.

----------
> From: Bill Fenner <[email-masked]>
> To: Peter Heiligers <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Bill Fenner <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
[email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: Excessive dvmrp routes 
> Date: Monday, November 10, 1997 5:12 AM
> 
> I started an mtrace to all 4200 routes that appeared in the routing
> table around the time that the first jump happened.  It's not done yet,
> but over half of them so far are ending up at
> tm-net-telekom-malaysia.Bloomington.mci.net with the typical symptom of
> Ciscos that are injecting routes but aren't configured to use them:
> 
>  -8  dec3800-1-fddi-0.Sacramento.mci.net (204.70.164.29)  DVMRP  thresh^
1  -49 s    [4/8]
>  -9  tm-net-telekom-malaysia.Bloomington.mci.net (166.48.173.250)  DVMRP 
thresh^ 0  -23 s    [default]
> -10  * * * * dec3800-1-fddi-1.Sacramento.mci.net (204.70.164.45) didn't
respond
> 
> So, could someone please configure
tm-net-telekom-malaysia.Bloomington.mci.net
> to only inject routes that it's responsible for?
> 
>   Bill